21.3.7.1. Relation between the number of sampling points and the optimization results

If ones construct the best meta-models, they use many sampling points in whole design space. Also, it is natural that best-meta models give good optimization results.

Suppose that the analysis time is much expensive, a negotiation is required for efficiency and best design. In general, optimization does not require the accurate meta-model through the design space. Although it starts with several points, SAO process finds new design points sequentially. These points are optimum candidates. Let’s consider the following case studies, which show their relations clearly.

\(\underset{\mathbf{x}}{\mathop{\min }}\,f\left( \mathbf{x} \right)=100\cdot {{\left( {{x}_{2}}-x_{1}^{2} \right)}^{2}}+{{\left( 1-{{x}_{1}} \right)}^{2}},{{\mathbf{x}}^{*}}={{\left( 1,1 \right)}^{T}}\)

CASE 1: The initial sampling points are 200 from the discrete Latin hypercube method. The blue colored points are the initial sampling ones in Figure 21.87. Kriging method is employed for meta-model. AutoDesign requires 5 SAOs. Hence, it requires total 205 analyses. The red points are 5 SAO points in Figure 21.87.

../_images/image1111.png

Figure 21.87 Case study 1: 200 sampling points

CASE 2: Now, only 20 sampling points are tried from the discrete Latin hypercube method. Then, Kriging model is used. In this case, AutoDesign requires 15 SAOs. Figure 21.88 shows the initial points (Blue) and the SAO ones (RED).

../_images/image1121.png

Figure 21.88 Case study 2: 20 sampling points

CASE 3: Finally, only 5 points are tried. These points came from Koshal Design. For fair comparison, Kriging meta-model is used. Then, AutoDesign requires 23 SAOs. Figure 21.89 shows the initial points (Blue) and SAO ones (RED).

../_images/image1131.png

Figure 21.89 Case study 3: 5 sampling points

These case studies show that good sampling for optimization is not the number of sampled points but the well space filling of design space.

If one solves the deterministic optimization problem, ISCD-I sampling is recommended. If he wants to solve robust design or DFSS, Latin hypercube sampling is required.