51. References

51.2. Reference

[Simo1998]

Simo, J. C., and Hughes, T. J. R., Computational Inelasticity, Springer, 1998

[Craig1968]

Craig R. R. and Bampton M. C. C., “Coupling of Substructures for Dynamic Analysis”, AIAA Journal, vol. 6, PP. 1313-1319., 1968

[Christian2000]

Christian Feldbauer, Robert Holdrich, “Realization of a Vold-Kalman Tracking Filter - A Least Squares Problem”, Proceedings of the COST G-6 Conference on Digital Audio Effects (DAFX-00), Verona, Italy, December 7-9, 2000)

[Vold1995]

Vold, H., Leuridan, J., “High Resolution Order Tracking at Extreme Slew Rates, using Kalman Tracking Filters”, Shock and Vibration, Vol. 2, No. 6, pp. 507-515 (1995)

[Vold1997]

Vold, H., Herlufsen, H., Mains, M., Corwin-Renner, D., “Multi Axle Order Tracking with the Vold-Kalman Tracking Filter”, Sound and Vibration 31, May 1997, pp. 30-35

[Tuma]

Tuma, J., “Vold-Kalman Order Tracking Filtration”, http://homel.vsb.cz/~tum52/download/VoldKalman.pdf

[Cowper1966]
    1. Cowper, The shear coefficient in Timoshenko’s beam theory. Transactions of the ASME, Journal of Applied Mechanics, JUNE, 1966. pp. 335~340.

[Warren]

Warren C Young. Roark’s Formulas for Stress & Strain. McGraw Hill. pp.401. 7th edition.

[Schmit1981]

Schmit, L.A., “Structural Synthesis - Its Genesis and Development”, AIAA Journal, Vol. 19, Oct. 1981, pp. 1249-1263.

[Vanderplaats1982]

Vanderplaats, G.N., “Structural Optimization - Past, Present, and Future”, AIAA Journal, Vol. 20, No. 7, 1982, pp. 992-1000.

[Barthelemy1992]

Barthelemy, J.-F., “Function Approximation”,(eds Kamat, M.P, Structural Optimization: Status and Promise), Progress in Astronautics and Aeronautics, AIAA,Vol 150, 1992, pp. 51-66

[Fleury1992]

Fleury, C. and Duysinx, P., “Optimization Software: View from Europe”, ,(eds Kamat, M.P, Structural Optimization: Status and Promise), Progress in Astronautics and Aeronautics, AIAA,Vol 150, 1992, pp. 807-847.

[Johnson1992]

Johnson, E.W., “Tools for Structural Optimization”, ,(eds Kamat, M.P, Structural Optimization: Status and Promise), Progress in Astronautics and Aeronautics, AIAA,Vol 150, 1992, pp. 851-862.

[Healy1974]

Healy, MJ., Kowalik, J.S., and Ransay, J.W., “Airplane Engine Selection by Optimization on Surface Fit Approximations”, Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 12, No. 7, July, 1974, pp. 593-599.

[Hurst1986]

Hurst, T.N., Free,J.C., Brtce, G.R., and Parkinson, A.R., “A Comparison of Regression and Mechanistic Techniques for Estimating Design Sensitive in Solving Constrained, Nonlinear Optimization Problems”, Design Engineering Technical Conference, Columbus, Ohio, Oct. 5-8, 1986, Paper No 86-DET-40.

[Free19987]

Free,J.W. etc, “Approximation of Computationally Expensive and Noisy Functions for Constrained Nonlinear Optimization”, Transaction of ASME, Journal of Mechanisms, Transmissions, and Automation in Design, Vol. 109, 1987, pp. 528-532.

[Sacks1989]

Sacks, J., Welcj, W.J., Mitchell, T.J. and Wynn, H.P., “Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments”, Statistical Science, Vol. 4, No.4, 1989, pp. 409-435.

[Mckay]

Mckay, M.D., Conover, W.J., and Beckman, R.J., “A Comparison of Three Methods for Selecting Values of Input Variables in the Analysis of Output From a Computer Code”, Technometrics, Vol. 21, pp. 239-245.

[Stein1987]

Stein, M., “Large Sample Properties of Simulations Using Latin Hypercube Sampling”, Technometrics, Vol. 29, No.2, 1987, pp. 143-151.

[Haftka1998]

Haftka, R.T., Scott, E.P. and Cruz, J.R., “Optimization and Experiments: A Survey”, Applied Mechanics Review, Vol. 51, No. 7, 1998, pp. 435-448.

[Simpson2001]

Simpson, T.W., Peplinski, J.D., Koch, P.N. and Allen, J.K., “Metamodels for Computer-Based Engineering Design: Survey and Recommendations”, Engineering with Computers, Vol. 17, 2001, pp. 129-150.

[Saliby]

Saliby, E., “Descriptive Sampling: An Improvement over Latin Hypercube Sampling”, Proceedings of the 1997 Winter Simulation Conference (eds. S. Andradottir, K.J. Healy, D.H. Withers, and B.L. Nelson), pp. 230-233.